What Happens Now that Gold and Silver Have Broken Out? Is 5000 ounce gold realistic?
In recent weeks gold and silver have broken through their multi-month consolidation levels, and investors are wondering where the precious metals are headed. On a short term basis both gold and silver are overbought and due for a correction that may retest the breakout levels of 1250 on gold and 20 on silver.
On a longer term basis, gold is at an all time high and silver is at a 30 year high. These breakout levels were key because they removed any supply of sellers wanting to sell near their previous purchase prices. The result will be a vacuum in price discovery, because virtually any investor in gold and silver now have a profitable trade and the price will have to rise until enough of these investors decide to take gains. Projecting from the size of the consolidation in precious metals the next key level where sellers arise could be near $1500 gold and $30 silver by 2011.
Gold has risen every year for 10 years in a row now, demonstrating a powerful bull market that began in 2000. Since gold bull markets tend to last 15 to 18 years, investors are wondering how much potential the precious metals have in them. Gold and silver have to move substantially higher to revert to their inflation adjusted highs. However further dollar devaluation could multiply the potential gains.
Taking into account 11 key measurements based on historical movements and price ratios, gold is likely to exceed $5000 and silver is likely to exceed $200 within the next 5 years. If silver reverts to its historical ratio of 16 to 1 with gold, then it could rise even higher.
While most of these statistics use the 1980 highs in gold and silver as a proxy, there is much more potential for a greater move in precious metals now because currency and economic imbalances are not confined to the US but are global. If the US dollar is devalued, it is likely that the Euro, Yen and other currencies would also be devalued. While the 1970's bull market in gold and silver was largely driven by US buyers, a panic to buy precious metals within the next 5 years will driven globally.
On a longer term basis, gold is at an all time high and silver is at a 30 year high. These breakout levels were key because they removed any supply of sellers wanting to sell near their previous purchase prices. The result will be a vacuum in price discovery, because virtually any investor in gold and silver now have a profitable trade and the price will have to rise until enough of these investors decide to take gains. Projecting from the size of the consolidation in precious metals the next key level where sellers arise could be near $1500 gold and $30 silver by 2011.
Gold has risen every year for 10 years in a row now, demonstrating a powerful bull market that began in 2000. Since gold bull markets tend to last 15 to 18 years, investors are wondering how much potential the precious metals have in them. Gold and silver have to move substantially higher to revert to their inflation adjusted highs. However further dollar devaluation could multiply the potential gains.
| Gold | |
| Current SGS inflation adjusted high 2015 with 6% inflation | $ 10,226 |
| Nasdaq 1995-2000, 6.66 factor | $ 8,658 |
| Gold 1975-1980 | $ 7,949 |
| Current SGS inflation adjusted high | $ 7,689 |
| 1980 dow to gold ratio of 1.5 to 1 | $ 7,240 |
| 80% dollar devaluation | $ 6,500 |
| 1930's dow to gold ratio of 2 to 1 | $ 5,430 |
| Nikkei 5yr 1985-1990, 3.63 factor | $ 4,719 |
| Adjusted by growth in money supply/gold supply | $ 4,697 |
| Current CPI adjusted high 2015 with 6% inflation | $ 3,168 |
| Current CPI adjusted high | $ 2,382 |
| Average | $ 6,241.64 |
| Silver | |
| Current SGS inflation adjusted high 2015 with 6% inflation | $ 594 |
| Current SGS inflation adjusted high | $ 447 |
| 1980 dow to silver ratio of 25 to 1 | $ 434 |
| 80% dollar devaluation and return to 1/16 gold | $ 410 |
| Adjusted by growth in money supply/gold supply | $ 276 |
| Silver 1975-1980 | $ 200 |
| Current CPI adjusted high 2015 with 6% inflation | $ 184 |
| Current CPI adjusted high | $ 139 |
| Nasdaq 1995-2000, 6.66 factor | $ 136 |
| 80% dollar devaluation | $ 102 |
| Nikkei 5yr 1985-1990, 3.63 factor | $ 74 |
| Average | $ 272.36 |
Taking into account 11 key measurements based on historical movements and price ratios, gold is likely to exceed $5000 and silver is likely to exceed $200 within the next 5 years. If silver reverts to its historical ratio of 16 to 1 with gold, then it could rise even higher.
While most of these statistics use the 1980 highs in gold and silver as a proxy, there is much more potential for a greater move in precious metals now because currency and economic imbalances are not confined to the US but are global. If the US dollar is devalued, it is likely that the Euro, Yen and other currencies would also be devalued. While the 1970's bull market in gold and silver was largely driven by US buyers, a panic to buy precious metals within the next 5 years will driven globally.
Do Industrialized Economies Support Growth?
The book "For Good and Evil: The Impact of Taxes on the Course of Civilization" by Charles Adams is a must read for those interested in learning how taxation has both created and destroyed civilizations. Over the course of history, governments have tried every tax strategy and tax rate imaginable from flat income taxes to taxes based on how many windows a building has. Students of history will find a clear pattern. Low and fair tax rates have fueled the creation of massive expansive empires, and repressive unfair tax rates have destroyed countries to the point at which they are no longer recognizable.
During the Pyramid age, Egyptian peasants paid 20 percent of their crops to the Pharaoh. Historically, medieval serfs and farmers revolted when tax rates exceeded 30 percent. European empires such as France and the Netherlands collected tax rates between 15 and 20 percent during the 1600's and prospered. However when those rates increased, it led to French Revolution in the late 1700's. The Roman Empire began as a free trade state, in which revenue was collected from 1 to 3 percent in property or sales taxes. However, in the last years of its decline, tax rates and inflation were so repressive that many peasants welcomed barbarians.
Although capital is often taxed at capital gains rates, global economic activity is largely defined by income derived from labor. In this spirit, it can be argued that capital will tend to flow into countries with low income tax rates and enough perceived economic and political freedom to conduct business transactions in the pursuit of happiness.
One reason why economies are able to grow is because workers are able to specialize in a particular skill and trade that skill for other services or products. This concept, known as division of labor, enables increased productivity because producers can focus on what will create the most economic value. For example suppose apples and oranges cost the same amount, but farmers are specialized in growing one or the other and can produce twice as much product in their field. The apple farmer can produce two apples and trade one with the orange farmer who produced two oranges so both would end up with more value than they could individually produce. However, if tax rates exceed 30 percent then this division of labor breaks down because the apple farmer wouldn't produce enough apples to pay the tax and trade for an orange. If tax rates exceed 50 percent, then the farmers would have to be 300 percent more productive in their specialization to make it worthwhile.
It is not a coincidence that the three largest economies have effective tax rates higher than 50 percent (including social security and other income taxes), zero economic growth, near zero interest rates, and are past the point of no return in insolvency.
The three largest economies in the world are in structural decline and represent 61 percent of the global economy, measured by GDP estimated at $58 trillion. Their currencies also account for 71.5 percent of the global foreign exchange market. The Swiss Franc, and British pound account for an additional 9.65 percent of the market which leaves only 20% of the remaining foreign currency market from a long list of countries.
Currency "investors" and traders are really just gamblers unless they are only seeking to hedge another business transaction. There is no fundamental basis for 80 percent of the market, and no reason why Jim Sinclair or others will be right that the US Dollar index will fall to 50 or below because all major currencies are priced against each other. However, compared to any tangible asset a severe decline in currencies is inevitable. If hyperinflation does occur, it will likely be in all major fiat currencies and be witnessed in all countries except those with a completely closed economy.
With virtually every major industrialized nation insolvent, using repressive taxation and unsound fiat currencies the implication is clear. No matter how bullish the prospects are for emerging economies – they are not large enough to sustain positive global economic growth nor do they have an alternative currency that could be used to replace foreign exchange at current levels. The reality of peak oil and other resources will cap emerging economy growth as well.
Because these global imbalances are structural, capital will continue to flee industrialized economies in favor of higher returns and lower taxes. The result will be overnight boom towns, and planned cities, but it's arguable whether much of this money will be misallocated. Precious metals could also undergo a historic revaluing as holders of majors currencies seek alternatives. It is unlikely that capital, or people anywhere in the world will be left unaffected by the ongoing and inevitable devaluing of all major currencies.
During the Pyramid age, Egyptian peasants paid 20 percent of their crops to the Pharaoh. Historically, medieval serfs and farmers revolted when tax rates exceeded 30 percent. European empires such as France and the Netherlands collected tax rates between 15 and 20 percent during the 1600's and prospered. However when those rates increased, it led to French Revolution in the late 1700's. The Roman Empire began as a free trade state, in which revenue was collected from 1 to 3 percent in property or sales taxes. However, in the last years of its decline, tax rates and inflation were so repressive that many peasants welcomed barbarians.
Although capital is often taxed at capital gains rates, global economic activity is largely defined by income derived from labor. In this spirit, it can be argued that capital will tend to flow into countries with low income tax rates and enough perceived economic and political freedom to conduct business transactions in the pursuit of happiness.
One reason why economies are able to grow is because workers are able to specialize in a particular skill and trade that skill for other services or products. This concept, known as division of labor, enables increased productivity because producers can focus on what will create the most economic value. For example suppose apples and oranges cost the same amount, but farmers are specialized in growing one or the other and can produce twice as much product in their field. The apple farmer can produce two apples and trade one with the orange farmer who produced two oranges so both would end up with more value than they could individually produce. However, if tax rates exceed 30 percent then this division of labor breaks down because the apple farmer wouldn't produce enough apples to pay the tax and trade for an orange. If tax rates exceed 50 percent, then the farmers would have to be 300 percent more productive in their specialization to make it worthwhile.
It is not a coincidence that the three largest economies have effective tax rates higher than 50 percent (including social security and other income taxes), zero economic growth, near zero interest rates, and are past the point of no return in insolvency.
| Country | GDP | Currency | % of Currency Exchanged Market | Unfunded Liabilities as Percent of GDP |
| EU | $16.4 Trillion | Euro | 42.45% | 434% |
| US | $14.2 Trillion | Dollar | 19.55% | 854% |
| Japan | $5 Trillion | Yen | 9.5% | 227% |
| Total | $35.6 Trillion | 71.5% | 574% |
The three largest economies in the world are in structural decline and represent 61 percent of the global economy, measured by GDP estimated at $58 trillion. Their currencies also account for 71.5 percent of the global foreign exchange market. The Swiss Franc, and British pound account for an additional 9.65 percent of the market which leaves only 20% of the remaining foreign currency market from a long list of countries.
Currency "investors" and traders are really just gamblers unless they are only seeking to hedge another business transaction. There is no fundamental basis for 80 percent of the market, and no reason why Jim Sinclair or others will be right that the US Dollar index will fall to 50 or below because all major currencies are priced against each other. However, compared to any tangible asset a severe decline in currencies is inevitable. If hyperinflation does occur, it will likely be in all major fiat currencies and be witnessed in all countries except those with a completely closed economy.
With virtually every major industrialized nation insolvent, using repressive taxation and unsound fiat currencies the implication is clear. No matter how bullish the prospects are for emerging economies – they are not large enough to sustain positive global economic growth nor do they have an alternative currency that could be used to replace foreign exchange at current levels. The reality of peak oil and other resources will cap emerging economy growth as well.
Because these global imbalances are structural, capital will continue to flee industrialized economies in favor of higher returns and lower taxes. The result will be overnight boom towns, and planned cities, but it's arguable whether much of this money will be misallocated. Precious metals could also undergo a historic revaluing as holders of majors currencies seek alternatives. It is unlikely that capital, or people anywhere in the world will be left unaffected by the ongoing and inevitable devaluing of all major currencies.
Are Banks Closing their Shorts on Gold and Silver?
In the past few weeks gold and silver have both broken out of their year-long consolidating trading ranges. This breakout came shortly after the announcement that JP Morgan and other banks would close their proprietary commodity trading desks in order to comply with a new "Volker Rule" which states that banks can either trade their own capital or their client's capital, but not both. This news has led to speculation that JP Morgan and others would be forced to close their short positions in gold and silver which has been well documented.
This speculation is overly optimistic, and the evidence proves to the contrary. From August 24th to September 14th the net commercial short position has increased from 82,158 to 94,825. This short position has most likely increased even more since then although it hasn't been reported yet. Gold's net commercial short position also increased from 436,829 to 464,388.
As most gold and silver traders know, this pattern is a typical setup for a takedown that occurs a few times every year. The banks that consist of the commercial category in the chart will continue to sell into the rising strength of the metals until it causes a sharp drop allowing them to cover at a profit.
If the commercial banks actually begin to reduce their gold and silver short positions as the price rises then it will be an indicator that they are exiting the market as some believe. The result would be dramatic as hedge funds would likely try to front run the banks and sellers would vanish. The structure of paper precious metals markets have made this outcome increasingly likely, however it is not probable that the commercial shorts will simply walk away without a fight. The inevitability of the long run is the least likely outcome in the short run because neither the government, nor commercial banks, nor accumulating smart money want gold or silver to spike higher.
Silver analyst Ted Butler was one of the first to bring this structure to the daylight however he is far too optimistic that government regulation or limiting trading positions will lead to this event. It is more likely that the futures market is closed than banks voluntarily ending their game. They may close their proprietary desks and move the positions to another legal entity.
One reason to be cautious is that gold has not touched its 200 day moving average in over a year. This simply means that the gold price has been very strong, but indicates an extended move. However extended moves can be life changing events. Gold's formation above its moving averages is beginning to look like Potash circa early 2007 which was the beginning of a 10 fold move in its price.
Historical evidence indicates that the precious metals will most likely see a sharp correction in the coming weeks. However, if they don't then Jim Sinclair could be collecting money on his $1 million bet early.
For more news and articles about investing in gold and silver visit Tradeplacer.com
This speculation is overly optimistic, and the evidence proves to the contrary. From August 24th to September 14th the net commercial short position has increased from 82,158 to 94,825. This short position has most likely increased even more since then although it hasn't been reported yet. Gold's net commercial short position also increased from 436,829 to 464,388.
As most gold and silver traders know, this pattern is a typical setup for a takedown that occurs a few times every year. The banks that consist of the commercial category in the chart will continue to sell into the rising strength of the metals until it causes a sharp drop allowing them to cover at a profit.
If the commercial banks actually begin to reduce their gold and silver short positions as the price rises then it will be an indicator that they are exiting the market as some believe. The result would be dramatic as hedge funds would likely try to front run the banks and sellers would vanish. The structure of paper precious metals markets have made this outcome increasingly likely, however it is not probable that the commercial shorts will simply walk away without a fight. The inevitability of the long run is the least likely outcome in the short run because neither the government, nor commercial banks, nor accumulating smart money want gold or silver to spike higher.
Silver analyst Ted Butler was one of the first to bring this structure to the daylight however he is far too optimistic that government regulation or limiting trading positions will lead to this event. It is more likely that the futures market is closed than banks voluntarily ending their game. They may close their proprietary desks and move the positions to another legal entity.
One reason to be cautious is that gold has not touched its 200 day moving average in over a year. This simply means that the gold price has been very strong, but indicates an extended move. However extended moves can be life changing events. Gold's formation above its moving averages is beginning to look like Potash circa early 2007 which was the beginning of a 10 fold move in its price.
Historical evidence indicates that the precious metals will most likely see a sharp correction in the coming weeks. However, if they don't then Jim Sinclair could be collecting money on his $1 million bet early.
For more news and articles about investing in gold and silver visit Tradeplacer.com
A Japanese Styled Economy is the Chosen Path
Large global imbalances both between and within nations have been well documented over the last decade and have continued to become more misaligned. While most commentators have argued why a Japanese style stagflationary reversion to the mean is unlikely, it is both the most wanted and mostly likely outcome of current imbalances. It is most wanted by policy makers and most likely for the reason that it's being targeted.
The Japanese economic model over the last 20 years is the best alternative for the Federal Reserve and other government policy makers because the alternatives are too great and terrible to imagine. If the government discontinued its intervention, the credit expansion created during the last 30 years would be completely reversed resulting in massive defaults to the point at which banking as a whole would discontinue. This is the natural force of the market. On the other hand, if the economy stalls and the government intervenes with too much force too quickly, then confidence in currencies would collapse and global hyperinflation would ensue. Either of these scenarios would risk a breakdown in society and likely change in government regime.
The Goldie-locks path would be to intervene just enough such that the dollar slowly depreciates, and financial firms slowly rebuild their balance sheets over decades. In this scenario society as a whole may slowly change, but change would be less drastic. The wealthy and powerful would benefit the most from this outcome as they would maintain their control. Meanwhile, the middle class would slowly disintegrate as pressures from all sides erode any remaining wealth and income. Make no mistake, the only deflation the Japanese have suffered is in asset prices not monetary supply. Costs will inflate including commodities, energy, transportation, and of course taxes. At the same time, income will stagnate at best or more likely fall. Interest income will remain below inflation and traditional investment performance will remain subpar. Businesses will operate with lower margins and lower returns. There will be near 0 economic growth, with near 0 interest rates, and near 0 employment growth.
Just as in Japan, the population will age and require more care. At the same time the number of children born will continue to fall, and immigration will decline as foreigners look elsewhere for opportunities. The result will be a declining population, with lower quality of services provided to them at a higher cost.
Investment Strategies for the Japanese Style Reversion to the Mean
Just as there has been over the last decade and last few weeks (depending on your perspective), there will be plenty of bull and bear markets with rallies and slides. Some traders may be able to time these correctly, but most won’t. On a grander perspective, equities will oscillate with no trend and no significant returns for long term investors. Even if bond investors aren’t slaughtered by higher rates, the best they will achieve is 2 percent return from government bonds. While commodities will rise, producers will also experience similar increases in production costs led by energy and construction. The result will be much higher commodity prices with little or no benefit to the producers. Stocks will be pressured lower by a decrease in PE ratios, stagnate dividends, and an aversion to risk. All asset classes will experience selling pressure from a change in demographics as workers retire and begin selling whatever assets they have to live off of.
Investors may seek to capitalize on the dollar carry trade by borrowing dollars and investing in other assets with higher expected returns. However, overuse of leverage could become detrimental as it did in 2008 even with undervalued assets.
Emerging markets would likely become a core component for successful investors as both the equities and bonds will likely outperform US or European based investments. Commodities will most likely continue to perform well, although their producers may not. Resource companies will have to dig and drill farther and farther into the ground to obtain less and less. Physical commodities will retain their value, but many can't be purchased and stored in large amounts. While it is feasible to buy physical gold and silver, buying soft commodities such as wheat and sugar are not practical investments for most people so it will be difficult to capture their gains. Commodity ETF's and futures will contango and slippage so they won’t track spot prices accurately. This can already be seen by comparing DBA to its underlying commodities and UNG to natural gas. Farmland itself will likely appreciate, however so will fertilizer and gas, so owning and operating a farm would not likely be as lucrative as investors expect. Precious metals will continue to outperform in this environment, because there simply isn’t any competing asset class. With interest rates near 0, there is no opportunity cost to carry gold or silver. Risks of large takedowns and possible impunitive taxes or capital controls will remain, however.
Investors may have to plan for a Japanese style reversion of imbalances that stretch into the next decade, as it is the chosen path by policy makers. Overall, profits will be harder to make and harder to keep, but they will still be available.
The Japanese economic model over the last 20 years is the best alternative for the Federal Reserve and other government policy makers because the alternatives are too great and terrible to imagine. If the government discontinued its intervention, the credit expansion created during the last 30 years would be completely reversed resulting in massive defaults to the point at which banking as a whole would discontinue. This is the natural force of the market. On the other hand, if the economy stalls and the government intervenes with too much force too quickly, then confidence in currencies would collapse and global hyperinflation would ensue. Either of these scenarios would risk a breakdown in society and likely change in government regime.
The Goldie-locks path would be to intervene just enough such that the dollar slowly depreciates, and financial firms slowly rebuild their balance sheets over decades. In this scenario society as a whole may slowly change, but change would be less drastic. The wealthy and powerful would benefit the most from this outcome as they would maintain their control. Meanwhile, the middle class would slowly disintegrate as pressures from all sides erode any remaining wealth and income. Make no mistake, the only deflation the Japanese have suffered is in asset prices not monetary supply. Costs will inflate including commodities, energy, transportation, and of course taxes. At the same time, income will stagnate at best or more likely fall. Interest income will remain below inflation and traditional investment performance will remain subpar. Businesses will operate with lower margins and lower returns. There will be near 0 economic growth, with near 0 interest rates, and near 0 employment growth.
Just as in Japan, the population will age and require more care. At the same time the number of children born will continue to fall, and immigration will decline as foreigners look elsewhere for opportunities. The result will be a declining population, with lower quality of services provided to them at a higher cost.
Investment Strategies for the Japanese Style Reversion to the Mean
Just as there has been over the last decade and last few weeks (depending on your perspective), there will be plenty of bull and bear markets with rallies and slides. Some traders may be able to time these correctly, but most won’t. On a grander perspective, equities will oscillate with no trend and no significant returns for long term investors. Even if bond investors aren’t slaughtered by higher rates, the best they will achieve is 2 percent return from government bonds. While commodities will rise, producers will also experience similar increases in production costs led by energy and construction. The result will be much higher commodity prices with little or no benefit to the producers. Stocks will be pressured lower by a decrease in PE ratios, stagnate dividends, and an aversion to risk. All asset classes will experience selling pressure from a change in demographics as workers retire and begin selling whatever assets they have to live off of.
Investors may seek to capitalize on the dollar carry trade by borrowing dollars and investing in other assets with higher expected returns. However, overuse of leverage could become detrimental as it did in 2008 even with undervalued assets.
Emerging markets would likely become a core component for successful investors as both the equities and bonds will likely outperform US or European based investments. Commodities will most likely continue to perform well, although their producers may not. Resource companies will have to dig and drill farther and farther into the ground to obtain less and less. Physical commodities will retain their value, but many can't be purchased and stored in large amounts. While it is feasible to buy physical gold and silver, buying soft commodities such as wheat and sugar are not practical investments for most people so it will be difficult to capture their gains. Commodity ETF's and futures will contango and slippage so they won’t track spot prices accurately. This can already be seen by comparing DBA to its underlying commodities and UNG to natural gas. Farmland itself will likely appreciate, however so will fertilizer and gas, so owning and operating a farm would not likely be as lucrative as investors expect. Precious metals will continue to outperform in this environment, because there simply isn’t any competing asset class. With interest rates near 0, there is no opportunity cost to carry gold or silver. Risks of large takedowns and possible impunitive taxes or capital controls will remain, however.
Investors may have to plan for a Japanese style reversion of imbalances that stretch into the next decade, as it is the chosen path by policy makers. Overall, profits will be harder to make and harder to keep, but they will still be available.