TradePlacer.com - Gold, Silver, Wine Trading

Login

Password

Forgot Password?
 
  Rickards: ?$10,000 Number For Gold Well Grounded Analytically?  
  Lorimer Wilson on 2016-08-28 13:42:32.0
 
 

.James    Rickards..I am often asked how I can say gold prices will rise to $10,000 without knowing developments in the world economy, or even what actions will be taken by the Federal Reserve. [The answer is that]…it's the implied non-deflationary price of gold…What is the non-deflationary price? [It is the] price gold would have to be in order to support global trade and commerce, and bank balance sheets, without reducing the money supply and that's $10,000 a [troy] ounce…

The comments above and below are excerpts from an article by Jim Rickards (DailyReckoning.com) which has been edited ([ ]) and abridged (?) to provide a faster and easier read.

If you take the global M1 of the major economies, times 40% (I use 40% backing. A lot of people don't agree with that. The Austrians say it's got to be 100%.) and divide that by the amount of official gold in the world, the answer is approximately $10,000 a [troy] ounce.

…Now, if you go to 100%, using M1, you're going to get…$25,000 a [troy] ounce. If you use M2 at 100%, you're going to get $50,000 a [troy] ounce. If you use 20% backing with M1, you're going to get $5,000 a [troy] ounce. All those numbers are going to be different based on the inputs, but just to state my inputs, I'm using global major economy M1, 40% backing, and official gold supply of about 35,000 tons. Change the input, you'll change the output, but there's no mystery. It's not a made-up number. The math is eighth grade math, it's not calculus.

The above is where I get the $10,000 figure. It is also worth noting that you don't have to have a gold standard, but if you do, this will be the price.

The now impending question is, are we going to have a gold standard? That's a function of collapse of confidence in central bank money…Each bailout gets bigger than the one before. Yes, they do the bailouts, building upon ?truncation.? Yes, governments don't go down without a fight. Policy-makers will truncate a global financial crisis, but then take the analysis a step further…

If the next crisis is bigger than the last one, which I expect, and the central banks are tapped out, where is the money coming from? How will they re-liquify the world? The answer is, the IMF is going to print a massive amount of dollars of SDRs. Is that inflationary? Of course it is.

If you flood the market in dollars of SDRs, one of two things is going to happen:

  1. either that's going to work, and will be highly inflationary, which is going to take gold to $10,000 a [troy] ounce, or
  2. it's not going to work, in which case you're going to have to go back to a gold standard, in which case it's going to be $10,000 a [troy] ounce.

You can have multiple paths, and timing has to be watched, but the $10,000 number for gold is very well grounded analytically.

Disclosure: The above article has been edited ([ ]) and abridged (?) by the editorial team at munKNEE.com (Your Key to Making Money!) to provide a fast and easy read.
?Follow the munKNEE? on Facebook, on Twitter or via our FREE bi-weekly Market Intelligence Report newsletter (see sample here , sign up in top right hand corner)

 

The post Rickards: "$10,000 Number For Gold Well Grounded Analytically" appeared first on munKNEE dot.com.

 
 
Market Categories Search Symbol Trade Register Other Links FAQ Blog Editorials Charts Contact Us Terms Bookmark and Share Site Meter